Skip to content
Login

Who Really Owns the Company? Beneficial Ownership Questions in a Business Account Review

2026-10-29

A hand holding a magnifying glass over a printed document on a desk

The Question Behind the Company Name

A business account application starts with a company: its name, registration number, address and directors. Reviewers check all of that, but it isn't really what they're after. The question that matters more is simpler, and often harder to answer on paper: which people, in the end, own and control this business?

Those people are the beneficial owners. A company is a legal wrapper. Somebody stands behind it, takes the profit and makes the decisions, and anti-money-laundering rules require a bank or payment provider to know who that is before money starts moving. For a company owned outright by its founder, this takes five minutes. For a group with a holding company in one country, an operating company in another and a trust somewhere along the way, it can take weeks.

What Counts as a Beneficial Owner

Under the current EU rules, holding more than 25% of a company's shares or voting rights is the usual sign of ownership. It's a signal, not the whole test. Someone with 10% who can appoint the board, or who controls the company through a shareholder agreement, counts too. So does a person whose stake runs through other companies: if you own 60% of a holding that owns half of the operating company, the reviewer will do that maths.

When nobody meets the test, the rules fall back on the senior managing official, usually the CEO or managing director, who is then recorded as the beneficial owner. That fallback is legitimate. Still, expect a reviewer to ask whether nobody really controls the business, or whether the shares are simply spread so that everyone stays just under the line.

The line itself is about to move. From 10 July 2027, the EU's new Anti-Money Laundering Regulation applies directly in every member state and changes the test from "more than 25%" to "25% or more". It also allows a lower threshold, down to 15%, to be set later for higher-risk types of company. Four partners with 25% each currently leave nobody over the line on shares alone. Under the new rule, all four are beneficial owners.

Why Every Layer Adds Time

Each company in an ownership chain brings its own set of documents: a certificate of incorporation, a register of shareholders, often a register of directors and a recent extract from the official registry. A three-layer structure means three sets, frequently from three countries and sometimes in three languages. The reviewer's job is to join them into one line that runs from the operating company to a named person.

Layers aren't suspicious in themselves. Groups use holding companies for investors, for tax planning, for keeping intellectual property apart from operations, or simply because the business grew that way. What slows a review down is a layer nobody explains. If a company in the chain has no staff, no other activity and no obvious reason to exist, the reviewer will ask why it's there. Have the answer ready before they ask.

Where each layer is registered matters as well. A link in the chain based in a country that appears on international high-risk or sanctions lists changes the tone of a review from the first page. For the payment side of the same question, see our piece on blacklisted jurisdictions.

Nominees, Trusts and Other Grey Areas

Nominee shareholders and directors are legal in many places. They're also one of the first things a reviewer looks for, because a nominee's name on the register says nothing about who gives the instructions. If your structure uses nominees, say so up front and include the nominee agreement or declaration of trust that names the person they act for. Reviewers tend to find nominees eventually. Finding one you didn't mention is what costs you their trust.

Trusts and foundations work differently. There's no shareholder to point at, so reviewers look at every role around the trust: the settlor who set it up, the trustees, any protector, and the beneficiaries or class of beneficiaries. A copy of the trust deed, or at least the clauses that define those roles, saves a full round of questions.

Bearer shares, informal side agreements and "a friend is holding the shares for now" belong in a different category. They tend to end the conversation rather than slow it down.

Registers Help, but They Don't Settle It

EU countries keep central registers of beneficial owners, and plenty of companies assume their register entry is all a bank needs. It's a starting point. Since a November 2022 ruling by the EU Court of Justice struck down general public access to these registers, access has narrowed in several countries. And banks were never supposed to rely on the register alone: they still have to run their own checks.

The more common problem is a mismatch. The register says one thing, the company's own shareholder register says another, and the application form says a third because a share transfer last year was never filed. Before applying, compare all three. A discrepancy you've already corrected is a footnote. One the reviewer discovers becomes a question about everything else you've submitted.

How to Present Ownership So It Can Be Checked

What helps here is unglamorous and specific:

Ownership questions usually sit next to source of funds questions, because the reviewer wants to know both who owns the business and where its money came from. Our article on source of funds requests covers the second half.

Then keep it current. Ownership doesn't stop mattering after onboarding. A new investor crossing the threshold, or a change of control, is something your provider will expect to hear from you rather than discover on its own.

How This Works at Polydirection

Polydirection provides international accounts and payments for businesses with complex cases: SEPA, SWIFT, multi-currency IBANs and Mastercard, routed through one account. Every application is reviewed individually, not just by automated rules, and crypto, gambling, forex and dating businesses get a dedicated manager rather than a form-letter decline.

For a company with a layered structure, that difference is practical. A person can ask about the one holding company that needs explaining, instead of a system rejecting the file because two fields didn't match. A clear ownership chart won't decide the outcome on its own, but it makes the conversation shorter. If you've been turned down elsewhere over a structure question, our piece on individual reviews explains what a second look can and can't change.

If you'd like to talk through your structure before applying, contact us.